I asked the question for the interview of The Crypto Lifestyle, so if you are going to post the videos with answers feel free to ignore it.
How are you going to tackle institutions? Many hedge/VC funds and have regulatory restrictions regarding custody of their investments. So even if they wanted to use Nash, they might not. This is why Coinbase have developed Coinbase custody. A lot of these players are starting to use it.
Do you have any plan to develop a similar product to Coinbase Custody that could be used by institutions?
Do you think there is a way you could get your second gen key management certified such that it could be used by institutions and replace their custody solutions?
Hello,
thanks for this opportunity!
I would like to know if you are working on the integration of other assets simultanously.
In other words, we all know that Bitcoin is your priority atm and I think it it obvious we all appreciate this. But after Bitcoin trading is implemented, will you start from the scratch again or is there someone already working on the following implementations? If not, will this strategy change after Bitcoin or will it continue to be ‘one after another’.
Thanks
We do not discuss regulatory processes. What I can say is that our current focus is not security dealer, but wining market share with exchange product we already have operational. Digital securities trading is a market that still has some significant time to mature, we will revisit this in 2020.
I don’t know how CMC is filtering legitimate trading, given the plague of wash trading that has hit our industry past year. So that ranking might not be relevant to that. We certainly are on track on our plan to be on the top 50 exchanges when considering legitimate volumes.
Our expectations on what that means in numbers have been shared in the community before, as I known you @sharkie you can probably clip it, but we see TOP50 at about 100m/day. This is not a guarantee but on our roadmap we are consistently hitting the milestones for that.
I think this is a symptom of our success to offer a product that offer same user experience of centralized exchange while being non-custodial, generating this kind of expectations.
I will be clear: is not possible to just get a list of networks and add in Nash for trading, we are non-custodial. The network needs to meet some technical requirements.
That said, current TOP20 are:
Legend:
WIP - Work in progress.
OK - Already in Nash
FUT - To be seen, unknown if it is feasible given its limitations. Future work.
BLK - Not being worked, legal uncertainty.
SEC - Not being worked, current possible security concern in consensus.
We believe in decentralization so much that even our team is fully remote. And yes, attracting great talent is a by-product. We are absolutely convinced that great talent comes in every culture, language, color, sex and religion. Decentralization is diversity, that is from where it extracts all its security and economic qualities (you trust more Bitcoin many miners because you expect they to be diverse in how they act, on their goals and on their beliefs).
But like with the networks it self, being fully remote indeed does presents many new challenges, coordinating work and guaranteeing communication has very low latency are the hardest, for this reason we since day-1 have been constantly trying to improve our processes internally - changing both process and tooling whenever it seems to make sense. Due to this we have continued to see better execution and I personally think we can even surpass traditional forms of coordination given how we can make everything async. If you are interested in this topic this is a good write up of how async can help: https://blog.remote.com/why-you-should-be-doing-async-work/
We will continue to be fully remote for the foreseeable future, we do however have “timezone bands” we aim for, and naturally happens to have more than one employee in some cities - that we encourage people to meet and build social bonds.