Which ERC tokens would you like to see on Nash Exchange in the future?

Crypto Analysis and Research
#1

Hello everyone!
We would like to ask to the community, which ERC TOKENS would you like to see on Nash in the future.
We think this topic can help Team to have an interesting list.

We like to remember the list of the coin/tokens are already in Work in Progress (WIP):

  1. Bitcoin Cash - WIP
  2. Litecoin - WIP
  3. Dash - WIP
  4. Dogecoin - WIP

Let us remember that projects must be SAFE and LEGAL .

This is survey that is not official from Nash and results are no promise to become reality.

Thank you,
The Ambassadors

2 Likes
#2

Ethereum Classic! And that should have been there since release. It was never said why it is missing. All posts from me have been ignored!

3 Likes
#3

ENJIN (ENJ)
as already said here:

3 Likes
#4

Maker (MKR)
Dai (DAI/SAI)
Synthetix (SNX)
Augur (REP)

7 Likes
#5

I would love to see:

  • Hashgraph (HBAR)
  • Maker/Dai (Hoping it is clear in the stable coin regulation :shushing_face: )
  • ICX
  • XLM
  • NEX :upside_down_face:
3 Likes
#6

Good Evening, Nasheteers :slight_smile:

One of the few Projects I really love besides nash is called swissborg with its CHSB (ERC20) Token. Even though there is not millions of volume in this token, it would be a really nice addition for nash exchange. I think both communities and projectteams have a very similar “DNA”. They centralize what they have to to be compliant, all the rest and the core idea is decentralization. Swissborg recentyl launcht their wealth app, which is extremely fast and cool to trade. Besides that they use a so called proof of meritocracy…a very democratic approach were tokenholders can vote about in which direction the company should develop and even get rewarded for voting…so pretty cool stuff and a nice addition for nash for sure :slight_smile:

#8

when talking about erc-20 tokens i like to se ona Nash is legal tokens with good community
ENJIN (ENJ)
OMISEGO (OMG)
Decentraland
MCO
NEXO
MATIC
LOOPRING
PUNDI X
POWER LEDGER

2 Likes
#9

Tether, Paxos, TrueUSD - because the more the merrier
EOS, Tron - because fanboys
ETH Classic & Elastos - because community
Bitcoin SV - because Craig Wirght’s a fraud
BNB - to give users somewhere to dump their BNB when they migrate to Nash
XLM & XRP - because one has decent tech and the other has an army
VET, XTZ, ADA & ATO - because the future
Dogecoin - because 1 doge is always 1 doge
Decred, OMG, BAT & ZRX - because we can
ICX, RVN, ZIL & KMD - because they’ll be ready way before ADA, XTZ and ATO
MKR and DAI - because why haven’t you done it already
REN & SNX - because if you can’t beat 'em join 'em
Grin, Bancor & Civic - no reason

If it’s legal and has more than 1000 BTC daily volume add it ASAP, the halving is upon us and no-one outside the community has a clue what Nash is and does. Bitcoin typically peaks ~18 months post halving and everything else usually gets dragged up with it, if those assets aren’t already listed on Nash people will go wherever they are listed (see the death of Bittrex and rise of Binance circa 2017). So far it seems that no-one (normies especially) cares much about custodial/non-custodial and the OG’s are all whining about KYC, the way to win is to have Coinbase’s UI, Binance’s market breadth and depth along with FTX/Bitmex’s ridiculous derivatives and leverage.

Nash should be amoral when it comes to listing new assets, as long as it’s legal we should be adding it, assets, leverage, derivatives anything to be competitive and give us an edge. Non-custodial, MPC key management, distributed blockchain agnostic matching engine; all of these things don’t seem to matter to the average user.

Nash’s biggest edge at the moment is that institutions can use Nash because of the ability to separate custodian and trader however institutions are using Bakkt, Fidelity, Graycale and Coinbase custody.

In theory Nash could be better than a combination of Binance, Coinbase, FTX, Bitmex, Bakkt, Fidelity and Grayscale… in practice we haven’t even surpassed Switcheo and Idex.

Also Monero.

2 Likes
#10

Tether, Paxos, TrueUSD - because the more the merrier

I’m pretty sure we’re not getting any of those. USDT won’t be added because of legal reasons. USDC is Nash’s USD-based stablecoin.

Bitcoin SV - because Craig Wirght’s a fraud

Are you just trolling now? Nash have already said BSV won’t be added due to security issues.

Dogecoin - because 1 doge is always 1 doge

DOGE is already on the list of coins that will be added.

Nash should be amoral when it comes to listing new assets, as long as it’s legal we should be adding it

That’s not the only consideration. Security is one issue. Feasibility is another issue (XRP has technical limitations, for example). As well as reputability. I don’t think Nash can be “amoral”.

1 Like
#11
  1. Bitcoin Cash - WIP
  2. Litecoin - WIP
  3. Dash - WIP
  4. Dogecoin - WIP

Let’s get these for a start, as they’re already planning on adding them. The key thing is, in my opinion, that we get the main coins which are legal, feasible and add volume. With that in mind, there are only a handful of projects, coins and tokens which qualify. I could be wrong.

Let’s remember that the majority of “cryptocurrencies” are simply ERC20 tokens, and most of these do not have a valid usecase or user base. That eliminates 99% of them and leaves us the 1% which actually are serious projects and can be added. Let’s not make Nash a cryptocurrency casino, as some exchanges have been accused of becoming. Nash is a serious project which accepts serious projects.

#12

Yes Bitcoin SV is obviously a joke, amoral is probably the wrong choice of word here maybe impartial is a better term. So if it’s secure, legal and feasible Nash should be impartial and add it ASAP. Reputation is too objective so I don’t think it should be a factor, if the team thinks two assets are feasible and secure reputation should be used only as a decider as to which asset to support first.

#13

Reputation is too objective so I don’t think it should be a factor, if the team thinks two assets are feasible and secure reputation should be used only as a decider as to which asset to support first.

At the end of the day, Nash is a private company, so it’s going to make its own decisions as to what will or will not be listed.

#14

True that.

#15

Unibright would nice too, big community, and only tradable on “DEXs” or unknown CEX.

2 Likes
#16

It would be great to see Hiveterminal’s HVN token on Nash. Also BOLT.

#17

Unibright (UBT) :ok_hand:

2 Likes
#19

I think it’s better if you contact QRL’s team and you will ask about Nash’s listing.

1 Like
#21

Quant Network - But I’ve been told that they have finished their application with Nash and that Nash will be listing them soon after BTC.
Take ‘soon’ with a pinch of salt as we know soon is a long time in Nash land

2 Likes
#22

I’d like to see Cryptobuyer - XPT

#23

You should implement the BTC and USDC pairs of now listed crypto (link, bat, rlc, etc…) before adding token.
We should respect the project for applying for listing.
Do you think there’s a project you’d like to list on an exchange that’s paying for a listing but not getting any pairs at all?

Look at the state of Binance now that it has simply increased the variety of token it carries. Various pairs have been delisted one after another.
Some developers are shying away from listing Binance as a project.

Be an exchange that is eager to be listed!
When this works well, the network effect will gradually explode!