Shape-shift attracts a lot of volume from 3rd party wallets for payments/ exchange.
Can someone give me rundown on why Nash’s protocols are better than Shape-Shifts please? …
also i dont think they provide USD-C
Many thanks
Shape-shift attracts a lot of volume from 3rd party wallets for payments/ exchange.
Can someone give me rundown on why Nash’s protocols are better than Shape-Shifts please? …
also i dont think they provide USD-C
Many thanks
Shapeshift is a centralized service with very high fee’s where Nash is a decentralized exchange service where the user owns their funds and has low fees. That would be the main difference in my opinion.