I cant say I agree with this. While I see how the suggestion can create value (for the holder), I think it goes against what the team’s core purpose and core values are. That generous 75% of fees being shared with those that stake underscores nash’s commitment to keep the project for the people.
To me that 75% is a northstar in this space and once our volume is sky high everyone will see that star and think “damn I should be doing that to get users on my platform”. This is how EVERYBODY wins and beats the old system.
The moment they start to take measures to line their pockets (i.e reducing this 75% or the total fees against which it is muliplied), it will waterdown their promise from the outset, their uniqueness in the space, as well as their edge as a pioneer.
I like @bhawani idea though. The perks can be connected to high trading volume or people with high spending patters on Nashpay. I am thinking different tier cards with accompanying perks per tier.
Just my take…