Exchange feedback JTb 1

NeedForSpeed · October 13, 2019, 7:37pm

“Trading contract” is indeed better than “trading account” for the reason Fabio mentions.

I notice that in the meantime this correction was made already on 2 different places on the exchange :

in the text on the left (“If you want to trade, you’ll have to send funds to the trading contract.”)
in the header with the overview of all the assets (the header now says “trading contract”)

However, the correction is not made yet in the green boxes on the top right side of the Asset page.

Suggestion to put in this upper green box to the right: “Personal trading contract”.
It should be clear to Nash users that whatever they do on the exchange, they are the only ones in control of their funds, and Nash never owns these assets.

So in that case we have:
External account Personal account Personal trading contract

Snooman1988 · October 13, 2019, 7:51pm

Can you add a € sign as a value, so you can choose somewhere in settings between € and $ value or is that allready possible?

JuanitoTheBandito · October 13, 2019, 8:30pm

+1

Symiaq · October 13, 2019, 8:53pm

Maybe it would make more sense to tag funds with a status. Something like:

“available” for the term personal account
“trading” for the term trading account
“staking” for the staked tokens
“payment” for tokens reserved for payments with nash pay

Overall then the term (personal) account can be used for the whole nash experience. Further there will be discussions about changing the status of your funds. Changing the status of your funds with a blockchain transaction is maybe easier to understand.

redk · February 22, 2020, 4:33pm

ur most likely aware …but was looking in to Argent and just FYI

These Ethereum fees, known as ‘gas’, are covered by Argent. Subject to fair use policy

so sending from the contract and personal accounts would be “free”… or paid for by NASH and then recovered in some other way. some fancy channel work between the user and Nash

in terms of user experience …could add less friction … automate everything as much as possible

canesin · February 22, 2020, 4:48pm

@redk on Argent you aren’t using a normal wallet, but instead a smart contract. The tokens you hold are instead hold in that smart contract with a balance in your name. So when you “send” from it the smart contract can pay the fees in your behalf.

It might be a good way for us to manage Ethereum in the future, it just added too much complexity on top of all the things we are already working.

redk · February 23, 2020, 1:00am

just a heads up…im sure you guys talk. but they are going full steam on defi over at arjent “main priority” looks like they are intergrating C0mpound

the big sell being : deposit ur stablecoin with us and also get a high interest rate. Also Zero fees transferring from analogue to crypto

feel free to remove as its prob off topic