The point of asking was to see if anyone in the community has done some research and has thought about why Nash might be better than REN even though KYC is required, for example REN mentions wrapping BTC and maybe there are some serious drawbacks or technical trade-offs because of this.
KYC has been the main rebuttal from most of the crypto OG’s/idealists so its a relevant point of contention within the wider crypto community.
Nash needs to take some market share from the existing platforms if they’re to succeed, sure some of the first time retail normies that’ll come in after the halving will try Nash, but the bulk of the volume after the next peak will be generated by the same people who have carried on generating volume on exchanges and other platforms since the previous all time high in 2017 and the one before that. Suggesting that acquiring a billion users without taking market share from existing platforms comes across as naive, yes Nash will grow the crypto pie but that will most definitely involve existing users migrating over to Nash in addition to new users coming into the space.
bitcoinmarket.com -> mt.gox -> coinbase, bitfinex, bittrex -> binance -> Bitmex, FTX
Users will migrate as incentives change good or bad.